What should an applicator do when state and federal pesticide laws differ?

When state and federal pesticide laws differ, the best practice is to follow the stricter state standards. This approach ensures compliance with the highest level of safety and environmental protection, which often reflects a more cautious or comprehensive regulatory framework. By adhering to the stricter state regulations, applicators not only fulfill legal obligations but also engage in responsible pesticide use that prioritizes the well-being of the public, non-target organisms, and the environment.

Many state laws are designed to address specific local concerns and may account for unique ecological or health risks that federal laws do not fully encompass. Therefore, choosing to follow the stricter regulations enhances compliance and demonstrates a commitment to best practices in pest management.

The other options generally suggest a less responsible approach. For instance, following only federal standards might neglect state-specific issues. Adopting the more lenient state standard could expose applicators and the public to unnecessary risks. Ignoring all regulations would lead to significant legal consequences and potential harm to the environment and public health. Thus, adherence to stricter state standards is essential for effective pesticide management.